2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (335 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1094 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Suburban | Polara |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2619 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2960 mm |
