2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (295 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1889 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Suburban | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2483 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 45 L |