2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (283 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Suburban | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5327 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2390 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3180 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 64 L |