2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,446 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 703 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Suburban | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 7446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2483 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2960 mm |