2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (335 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (509 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Suburban | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 95 L |