2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 661 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
Model | Tahoe | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 75 L |