2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1961 Wartburg 312

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1961 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1961 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1961 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Wartburg 312, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Wartburg 312.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 1961 Wartburg 312
Make Chevrolet Wartburg
Model Tahoe 312
Year Released 2005 1961
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4807 cc 900 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 260 HP 36 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 81 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96 mm 70.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 78 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 6.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2260 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 117 L 40 L