2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1575 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (447 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Tahoe | Herald |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 29 L |
