2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1245 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1965 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Tahoe | Munga |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 31 L |