2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1450 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tahoe | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2310 mm |