2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2006 Citroen C3
To start off, 2006 Citroen C3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2006 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (447 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2006 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Tahoe | C3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |