2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 867 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Tahoe | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 51 L |