2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. (295 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (447 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi R8. (430 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Tahoe | R8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 90 L |