2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2011 Maybach Landaulet
To start off, 2011 Maybach Landaulet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2011 Maybach Landaulet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Maybach Landaulet (620 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Maybach Landaulet should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Maybach Landaulet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Maybach Landaulet (999 Nm) has 552 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. (447 Nm). This means 2011 Maybach Landaulet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2011 Maybach Landaulet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maybach |
Model | Tahoe | Landaulet |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 620 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 999 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 110 L |