2005 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 970 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe (447 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Tahoe | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 47 L |
