2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1949 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1949 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Tracker | A6G |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
