2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Tracker | F 89 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |