2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1960 Simca Oceane
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Oceane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Oceane would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1960 Simca Oceane. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1960 Simca Oceane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Simca Oceane. (88 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Simca Oceane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1960 Simca Oceane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
| Model | Tracker | Oceane |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |
