2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1962 DKW Junior
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Junior.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DKW Junior. (73 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1962 DKW Junior | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Tracker | Junior |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2180 mm |