2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Tracker | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |