2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Tracker | Seven |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2240 mm |
