2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1968 Fiat 850
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1968 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1968 Fiat 850.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Fiat 850. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Fiat 850.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1968 Fiat 850 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | 850 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2030 mm |