2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1976 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1976 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Tracker | 1400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |