2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1977 Dodge Omni
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,715 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1977 Dodge Omni. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1977 Dodge Omni.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Dodge Omni. (123 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1977 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | Omni |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |