2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1979 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1979 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Tercel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |