2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger.

Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Charger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Tracker 1986 Dodge Charger
Make Chevrolet Dodge
Model Tracker Charger
Year Released 2005 1986
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1592 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 98 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 117 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2460 mm