2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Tracker | Sundance |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |