2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1997 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1997 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3030 mm |