2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 676 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Tracker | HRT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |