2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Suzuki X90
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Suzuki X90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Suzuki X90 would be higher. Both 2005 Chevrolet Tracker and 2000 Suzuki X90 are equipped with a 1,590 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki X90. (97 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki X90.
Because 2000 Suzuki X90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki X90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki X90. (132 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki X90.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Suzuki X90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Tracker | X90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2210 mm |