2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Tracker 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander
Make Chevrolet Mitsubishi
Model Tracker Outlander
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 98 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2640 mm