2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Chevrolet Mercedes-Benz
Model Tracker C
Year Released 2005 2006
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2148 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 98 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2720 mm