2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1454 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 DAF 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1959 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 28 L |
