2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1960 Jaguar MK II

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 797 kg more than 1960 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK II.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 1960 Jaguar MK II
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model TrailBlazer MK II
Year Released 2005 1960
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4162 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 275 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 373 Nm 195 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 102 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 8.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2247 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1920 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 3280 mm 2900 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 11.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]