2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | TrailBlazer | EK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 164 Nm |
