2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Cortina |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 58.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |
