2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1504 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | Elite |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 29 L |