2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1574 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 29 L |