2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 999 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |
