2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1665 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | TrailBlazer | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 32 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2060 mm |