2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,725 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1382 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 TVR Griffith. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 4725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 67 L |
