2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1424 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 45 L |