2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 897 kg more than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1968 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TrailBlazer | W 111 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 179 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 55 L |