2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1969 Fiat 130
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Fiat 130. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Fiat 130 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1969 Fiat 130. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1969 Fiat 130. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 484 kg more than 1969 Fiat 130. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Fiat 130. (255 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Fiat 130.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1969 Fiat 130 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | TrailBlazer | 130 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 3238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 66 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |