2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1971 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1971 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1971 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1547 kg more than 1971 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1971 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1170 mm |