2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1972 Simca 1301
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Simca 1301. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Simca 1301 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1972 Simca 1301. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1972 Simca 1301. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1972 Simca 1301. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Simca 1301. (100 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Simca 1301.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1972 Simca 1301 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
Model | TrailBlazer | 1301 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |