2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1978 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1978 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1978 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | TrailBlazer | Mark II |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 170 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2590 mm |