2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 66 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
