2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 949 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | TrailBlazer | Sapporo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2520 mm |