2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Reliant Kitten
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (40 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1712 kg more than 1982 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Reliant Kitten. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Reliant Kitten | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Reliant |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Kitten |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 846 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 62.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 69.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2150 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 27 L |
